The AI standoff: Why Britain feels stuck
January 2026
AI change management: Embracing the excitement, managing the fear
Artificial intelligence is more than a technology shift; it’s a human shift. Leaders everywhere acknowledge that AI is transforming their organizations rapidly; yet despite investing heavily in algorithms and infrastructure, many are challenged in achieving the impact they envision.
The reality is that employees don’t experience AI as just another change. Instead, AI can represent both exhilarating opportunities and profound threats. Some anticipate an exciting future free from mundane tasks and full of innovation and professional growth. Others fear a loss of control, anxiety about job displacement, and increased stress in the workplace. These deeply emotional reactions can either powerfully drive or decisively hinder AI adoption.
As Eliezer Yudkowsky, an influential AI researcher, famously warned, “By far, the greatest danger of artificial intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it.”1 His words underline a crucial point; successful AI adoption demands not just technical readiness, but emotional and psychological readiness.
With more than 20 years of experience as organizational change managers in IT consulting, we’ve guided countless teams through transformative technological shifts—from initial uncertainty to full adoption. Yet, AI stands apart. No other technology has triggered such deeply emotional responses, making effective change management not merely helpful, but essential.
Every transformation has a people side, but AI magnifies this aspect in unique ways:
Novelty and uncertainty. ERP rollouts, cloud migrations, or process redesigns typically impact defined workflows. AI, however, raises existential questions: Will my role still exist? Will my expertise still matter? This identity-level uncertainty makes change management more complex. We often start workshops with a “future of my role” reflection exercise, where teams visualize how their work could evolve with AI. This helps transform fear into ownership.
Human–AI collaboration. AI doesn’t just sit in the background; it becomes a visible tool. Employees must learn how to trust, challenge and complement AI outputs. This requires leaders to strengthen culture, trust and governance, ensuring employees know when AI assists and when human judgment prevails. In our projects, we use co-creation workshops and explainability sessions to help employees build confidence and understand where human judgment adds value.
Bottom-up opportunity. Research on generative AI highlights that it is “well-suited to bottom-up development and use.”1 When workers help define AI use cases, the technology is more likely to augment their work rather than replace it.1
Pro-worker design. Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu and others emphasize that lasting benefits of automation come when AI is used to create new, higher-skilled tasks, not just eliminate existing ones.2 Organizations that design AI to support people, not replace them, will achieve both adoption and trust. The conversation becomes more about augmentation and less about automation. This is where CGI’s A3F framework (Awareness, Adoption, Accountability, and Future-readiness) helps leaders scale responsibly.
Pace discipline. As leaders from Google, ING and Capital One warn, AI adoption cannot follow a ‘gold rush‘ mentality. It requires scaffolding—data readiness, skills, governance, responsible-use policies before scaling widely.3
Employees’ perceptions of AI often swing between two poles: fear and excitement. Understanding both is essential for leaders.
Job displacement. While research suggests only a small percentage of jobs are likely to be heavily replaced or transformed in the next decade, uncertainty magnifies anxiety across the workforce. We’ve seen that Q&A sessions, led jointly by HR and project sponsors, often ease this fear more effectively than formal emails.
Loss of control. AI often feels like a “black box,” and when decisions lack transparency, employees may feel stripped of agency and fairness. Leaders can counter this by making AI decisions explainable and participatory; for instance, showing how AI recommendations are reviewed and where human oversight applies. In one of our engagements, simply visualizing the decision chain—AI suggests, manager decides, team validates—helped employees understand where their judgment remains essential. This combination of transparent frameworks and literacy initiatives builds confidence and a perception of fairness.
Stress and well-being. Surveys show that employees worried about AI report higher workplace stress and lower job satisfaction.4 Psychological safety is as important as technical safety. We’ve found that teams cope best when leaders normalize uncertainty and pair change with visible support systems: regular check-ins, peer learning circles, or micro-upskilling sessions that build confidence in small steps.
This mirrors the “Future-readiness” dimension of CGI’s A3F framework; sustainable adoption happens when people feel safe to learn and make mistakes.
AI adoption is not just a technical upgrade; it’s a human transformation. Unlike previous IT rollouts where success was measured by system stability or functionality, the success of AI depends on how people choose to engage with it.
The evidence is clear; organizations that invest in the human side of AI achieve stronger outcomes. No matter how advanced the algorithm or platform, without deliberate investment in the human journey, AI will stall. Change management provides the structure to address fears, build excitement, and guide organizations toward meaningful adoption.
This is where change management moves from principle to practice. It can provide leaders with the tools to turn employee perceptions into adoption. For example, using our A3F framework, we’ve experienced how change management can help clients move from awareness to sustained adoption.
AI adoption is a human journey before it’s a technical one. What makes AI different, including role identity uncertainty, new decision dynamics, and the need for bottom-up involvement, also explains why employees feel both fear and excitement.
Organizations that win with AI will not simply deploy the most advanced algorithms. They will design the most human-centered adoption strategies that include transparent governance, co-created use cases, continuous learning, and thoughtful work redesign.
That is the work of change management, turning fear into informed caution, excitement into committed practice, and AI from a risky bet into a durable capability.
Originally published by CGI, Assia Stoyanova and Jens M. Sorg
January 2026
January 2026